By: Dr.Paul Coulter
The
Dynamic of Apologetic Dialogue
Apologetics may happen at many different levels, from the highly
formal and intellectual (e.g. debates with leading atheist thinkers,
presentations in universities and parliaments) to the highly informal and less
strictly intellectual. Much of what follows in this section presumes the more
informal interactions that every believer should expect to engage in through
the normal process of life as described in 1 Peter 3. Apologist
Michael Ramsden has warned that [12]:
The temptation with apologetics is to offer
set answers to set questions. It can be useful to have a structure in mind when
dealing with certain issues. However, it is better to have an understanding of
how we can effectively engage with people at a conversational level… Apologetics
can become mechanistic. Although the truth of the Gospel remains constant, we
mustn’t think that by repeating things we have said to other people in the
past, we will automatically get the same response.
The aim of this section is to reflect on the dynamics of a
conversation with a nonbeliever.Based on 1
Peter 3:1316 and on personal
experience we can consider the constituent parts of this interaction:
A context
The context in which an apologetic interchange takes place is
vital to the dynamic of the conversation. This works at a number of levels: